Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 24, 2017No. 15-2178PPublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs challenge the Office of Personnel Management’s (“OPM”) regulations that exclude cost-of-living allowances (“COLAs”) 1 from the calculation of retirement and other benefits. These COLAs are received by federal employees working in non-foreign areas located outside the contiguous United States. Plaintiffs allege that these regulations are unlawfully discriminatory under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub L. No. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, 253-66, and are arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). The district…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Gonzalez v. OteroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Jane DiCocco v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Odyssey Logistics and Tech. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association v. Kiran AhujaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- Jane DiCocco v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.