Legal Opinion

State v. Carrolton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 2, 2011No. 2010-441PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

¶ 1. The State appeals from an interlocutory order of the criminal division of the superior court granting defendant’s motion to merge into a single count the two counts of lewd and lascivious conduct charged by the State. Relying on State v. Perrillo, 162 Vt. 566, 649 A.2d 1031 (1994), which involved facts very similar to this case, the trial court ruled that because the alleged offensive touching occurred continuously without any intervening act over a short period of time, the State could not charge defendant with multiple counts of lewd and lascivious conduct. Recognizing that our holding…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  2. State v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. Cullen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Eaddy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. DeSantis v. PeguesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Demag v. Better Power Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. Charles Ferry v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  3. Jennifer Zeno-Ethridge and Dennis Ethridge v. Comcast CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
  4. State v. Onix Fonseca-CintronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  5. Nancy MYRICK v. PECK ELECTRIC COMPANY, D/B/A Peck Solar, Encore Middlebury Solar I, LLC and Encore Redevelopment, LLC Dale Hastings and Jess Whitney v. Solarcommunities, Inc., D/B/A Suncommon, Sun CSA 6, LLC and Helios Solar, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API