Legal Opinion

Eustace v. New York Building-Loan Banking Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by John Cunneen, Attorney-General of the State of Hew York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 9th day of May, 1904, denying the appellant’s motion made to vacate an order of reference theretofore entered in the above-entitled action.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

On the 24th of February, 1904, in an action instituted by the People of the State of Hew York against the Hew York Building-*98Loan Banking Company for its dissolution, one Charles M. Preston was appointed a permanent receiver, and on the third of March following the firm of J. P. & A. C. Eustace presented a claim to the receiver for professional services rendered to, and disbursements made for, such corporation, amounting to $97,500. The receiver rejected the claim and offered to refer the same to some competent person to hear and determine. Subsequently the claimants and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Crane v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Stokes v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. People v. American Steam Boiler InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Federal BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API