Legal Opinion

Gandy v. Deese

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1997No. 29032-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

h STEWART, Judge.

Donald Deese, (“Deese”) defendant in this possessory action, appeals a trial court judgment on remand in favor of the plaintiffs, *621Mary Alice Hammons Gandy, Ronald Le-Gene Hammons, Margaret Hammons Cob-lentz, and Wilfred Coblentz (“Hammons”). The trial court judgment recognized the Hammons’ right to possession of certain immovable property. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS and PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In December of 1992, the Hammons instituted a possessory action, alleging that they had possessed immovable property in Jackson Parish since 1961. Deese possessed adjacent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Copellar v. YountLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Deano v. BrouilletteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burch v. BurchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Martin v. BristerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. State v. LowdinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API