Blythe v. Enslen

On a former appeal (203 Ala. 692, 85 South. 1), it was held that complainants’ (appellants’) action was one sounding in tort and governed by the statute of limitation of one year. This appeal seeks to review that conclusion.

Complainants’ bill was amended on its return to the trial court; but its claims upon the jurisdiction of equity remain substantially as they were before. The contents of the bill are sufficiently shown in the report of the former app'eal; but it is not amiss now to observe that, while the bill seeks to charge • defendants as for a breach of their alleged contract, as…