Legal Opinion
Stanley v. St. Paul
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided February 23, 2011No. 1:10-cr-00194PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge.
This prisoner civil rights ease was reassigned to this Court to consider whether dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A. Having reviewed the record, the Court enters the following Order.
REVIEW OF COMPLAINT
1. Standard of Law
Plaintiff James R. Stanley (Plaintiff) brings his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the civil rights statute. To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege a violation of rights protected by the Constitution or created by federal statute proximately caused by conduct of a person acting under color of state…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carr v. McKayDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2025
- Collins v. HenryDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Mattinas v. Idaho State Correction InstitutionDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023