Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Baldi

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1956No. 309PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Petitioner is a State prisoner at the State penitentiary in this district. He has applied for a writ of habeas corpus in forma pauperis. The allegations of his petition may be summed up as follows:

He was arrested and had a hearing before a magistrate. He was subsequently indicted by a grand jury. The indictment charged an offense slightly at variance with the charge on which he was originally held by the magistrate. Apparently the difference was between “passing worthless cheeks and forgery” and “fraudulently making a written instrument uttering and publishing same.”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Palakiko v. Harper, Warden of Oahu PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. Yodock v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Ex Parte SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Walls v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Swilley v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. United States Ex Rel. Maisenhelder v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. United States Ex Rel. Wilkins v. BanmillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Carvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API