Prouse v. Ransom
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
This litigation arises from a sharecropping agreement and a related agreement for hay hauling. Each side has accused the other of breaching these agreements. Following a jury trial, the district court entered a judgment primarily favoring the sharecrop tenants. On appeal, the farm owners have argued that relevant evidence was improperly excluded at trial, and that the jury was improperly instructed on the meaning of the sharecropping agreement. In a cross-appeal, the tenants have asserted an entitlement to prejudgment interest on the net monetary award they received. They also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. Professional Business Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Clearwater Minerals Corp. v. PresnellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- Meredith Corp. v. Design & Lithography Center, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Farnes v. GroverIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bondy v. LevyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Ross v. RossIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- Nguyen v. BuiIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hilt v. DraperIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- Nelson v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.