Stout v. AMCO Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LINDBERG, Judge. *
Appellant AMCO Insurance Company contends that the district court erred in finding it liable for the full amount of respondent’s medical expenses instead of the reduced amount that respondent’s medical providers accepted based on their contractual agreements with Medica Choice (through MinnesotaCare) and Medicaid. Appellant also contends that the district court erroneously calculated the statutory interest award. Because we find no error in the district court’s decision, we affirm.
FACTS
In July 1993, respondent Jason Stout injured both of his knees in a car accident.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Wallace v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Hoeschen v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984