Legal Opinion

Stout v. AMCO Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 2001No. CX-01-246Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LINDBERG, Judge. *

Appellant AMCO Insurance Company contends that the district court erred in finding it liable for the full amount of respondent’s medical expenses instead of the reduced amount that respondent’s medical providers accepted based on their contractual agreements with Medica Choice (through MinnesotaCare) and Medicaid. Appellant also contends that the district court erroneously calculated the statutory interest award. Because we find no error in the district court’s decision, we affirm.

FACTS

In July 1993, respondent Jason Stout injured both of his knees in a car accident.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Wallace v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Hoeschen v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API