Legal Opinion

Carey v. Musladin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 11, 2006No. 05-785PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

127 S.Ct. 649 (2006)

549 U.S. 70

Thomas L. CAREY, Warden, Petitioner,

v.

Mathew MUSLADIN.

No. 05-785.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 11, 2006.

Decided December 11, 2006.

Gregory A. Ott, San Francisco, CA, for petitioner.

David W. Fermino, San Francisco, CA, appointed by this Court, for respondent.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of California, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Donald E. De Nicola, Deputy Solicitor General, Peggy S. Ruffra, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Gregory A. Ott, Deputy Attorney General,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Thomas; Concurring in the judgment · Stevens; Concurring in the judgment · Kennedy; Concurring in the judgment · Souter.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Jesse Andrews v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. (HC) Anthony L. Zeigler v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (HC) Bottenfield v. RobertsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (HC) Cristobal v. CallahanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (HC) Duarte v. LizzaragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API