Legal Opinion

Deaton v. McClendon

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1951No. 6 Div. 95Published

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

This is a suit for personal injury damages growing out of a collision between two automobiles. In the court below there was a judgment for the plaintiff.

The assignments of error which are not stressed in brief of counsel will be deemed waived. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Chambers, 226 Ala. 192, 146 So. 524; Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Campbell, 10 Ala.App. 288, 64 So. 540.

Assignment of error number 5 attempts to raise the question which is argued in brief, but the assignment is not sufficiently specific to meet the demands of the rule. Harden, Inc., v. Harden, 29 Ala.App. 411,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. William E. Harden, Inc. v. HardenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Naftel v. County of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Smith v. WoolfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Bingham v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API