Legal Opinion

Prahl v. Redman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 24, 1941No. 4402PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUeNkoot, Judge

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding wherein the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirmed a decision of the Examiner of Interferences which awarded to appellee priority of the invention defined in the counts of the interference, eight in number.

The interference arises between a patent, No. 1,964,768, issued to appellants on July 8,1934, upon an application filed June 13,1933, and an application of appellee filed July 17, 1931, Serial No. 551,555.

Appellants’ patent contains 16 claims, and originally appellee copied all of them for purposes of interference. Eight…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Tansel v. HigonnetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  4. Sperry Rand Corp. v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  5. Theodore A. Te Grotenhuis v. Luther L. YaegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API