Legal Opinion
(PS) RuBang v. Brooks
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 7, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02351Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GONZALO R. RUBANG, JR., No. 2:18-cv-2351 TLN DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ERIC R. BROOKS; KELLER WILLIAMS, 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, Gonzalo Rubang, Jr., is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was 19 referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Pending before the court are defendants Eric Brooks and Keller Williams Realty, Inc.’s, motion to 21 set aside entry of default and to dismiss, and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.