Connell Construction Co. v. Phil Dor Plaza Corp.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hickman
Our statement of the case will be substantially in the language of the Court of Civil Appeals. The petitioner will be referred to as the contractor, and the respondent as the owner.
The suit grew out of a contract for the construction of a building. The contract was prepared in accordance with the standard form of agreement approved by the Associated General Contractors of America. It provided, among other things, for the supervision of the work by an Architect therein specified and for liquidated damages of $25.00 per day in the event the work should not be completed within 100 days (or by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dallas Electric Supply Co. v. Branum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
- Neeley v. County of TarrantTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Barnsdall Oil Co. v. HubbardTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Maxwell v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Routon v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Donwerth v. Preston II Chrysler-Dodge, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Humble Oil and Refining Co. v. City of GeorgetownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Johnson v. Downing and Wooten Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Cline v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Jordan v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.