Legal Opinion
Anglin Family Investments v. Hobbs
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 24, 2012No. Nos. SD 31655, SD 31666PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.
This consolidated appeal and cross-appeal arise from a contract for deed (“contract”) between Anglin Family Investments (“Seller”) and Aimee Deanne Hobbs (now Hodson, “Buyer”) that went wrong when a third party acquired title by adverse possession to a portion of the real property to be conveyed. After Buyer stopped making payments, Seller sued to eject Buyer from the property on the theory of unlawful detainer. Buyer counterclaimed, seeking a rescission of the contract based on a material decrease in the size of the real property that Seller could convey.
Following a bench trial, the trial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dunn Industrial Group, Inc. v. City of Sugar CreekSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- McKnight v. Midwest Eye Institute of Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re Marriage of WeinshenkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Harris v. DeSistoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Grand Teton Mountain Investments, LLC v. Beach Properties, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- AEFC, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent v. TAMMY D. VIETTI, Individually, and VIETTI ENTERPRISES, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- City of Bellefontaine Neighbors v. James CarrollMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- Gerald Titus and Anna Titus v. Scott Dunavant and Lisa Dunavant, as husband and wife, if living, their unknown heirs, devisees, grantees, assignees, alienees, legatees, personal representatives, and all other persons, corporations, or successors claiming by, through, or under themMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.