Legal Opinion

Caledonian Ins. v. Levy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 1, 1916No. 2634PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the Northern District of California; William C. Van Fleet, Judge. Action by S. W. bevy against the Caledonian Insurance Company and others. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This case is here for the second time. The first trial was had in the court below with a jury, and, there having been a verdict and judgment ifi favor of the plaintiff in the action, it was brought here by the defendants thereto, where the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. 199 Fed. 407, 118 C. C. A. 91. The second trial was before the court without a jury, and again resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. It is undisputed that the evidence on both trials was substantially the same — indeed, it is so stated by the trial court in its opinion,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caledonian Ins. v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sorensen v. Pyrate Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API