Legal Opinion

McElroy v. McElroy

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

PROM RUTHERFORD. Appeal from, the Chancery Court of Rutherford County. — =W. S. Bearden, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The»bill in this case contains these allegations, viz.: That W. E. McElroy made the following will: “I *139will, that after my death, my burial expenses are paid; that my two sons, J. N. MeElroy and W. Z. MeElroy, have and divide my household and kitchen furniture as they see fit; and that my son, W. Z. MeElroy, have my orange grove in Florida. I will that my granddaughter, Maggie MeElroy, and my grandson, Willie McEl-roy, have one hundred dollars each of the $216.35 that my son-in-law, A. B. MeElroy, owes me; and that my son-in-law, A. B. MeElroy, have the remainder of the note and account and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wayne v. FoutsTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Shaw v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Harrison v. HendersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Andrews v. AndrewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Parker v. SparkmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. GallaherTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Fowler v. PlunkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  3. Hardin v. HassellTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Geiger v. BitzerOhio Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Geiger v. BitzerOhio Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API