Legal Opinion
Roker v. Tower Hill Preferred Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 27, 2015No. 2D13-5565PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SLEET, Judge.
Rosalyn Roker appeals the final summary. judgment entered in favor of Tower Hill Preferred Insurance Company on her breach of contract claim arising from sinkhole damage to her home. Because a material issue of fact remains as to the method of subsurface repair, we reverse.
In 2010 Roker’s home sustained sinkhole damage, and she timely filed a claim with her insurer, Tower Hill. Tower Hill retained a professional engineer from AMEC-BCI Engineers & Scientists (BCI), who confirmed that the damage was a result of sinkhole activity. BCI’s recommended subsurface remediation plan…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Menendez v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Hassen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Universal Insurance Co. of North America v. WarfelSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Nard, Inc. v. DeVito Contracting & Supply, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Omega Insurance Company v. WallaceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. NunezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Sanchez v. Royal Palm Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Case v. Power Hill Prime Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Estrada v. Tower Hill Select Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015