Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1901No. 2192PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Dallas. Tried below before Hon. Kenneth Foree, County Judge. Appeal from a conviction of receiving stolen property, knowing the same to have been stolen; penaltj', one day’s imprisonment in the county jail. The cause is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of receiving stolen property from Edgar Warren and Ben Farrar, knowing the'same to have been stolen, and his punishment assessed at one day’s confinement in the county jail. Objection was reserved to the admission of testimony showing that certain railroad cars were burglarized at different times from the one mentioned in the'information. This objection should have been sustained. Where contemporaneous crimes tend to develop the res' gestae, show the intent, or identify the transaction, they are admissible; and, under certain circumstances,'…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hochman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Poon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Bowman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API