Legal Opinion

Avendano v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2006No. 05-75153Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Audelia Salas Avendano and her children Jose Ayon Salas, Claudia Ayon Salas, Ismael Ayon Salas, Isidro Ayon Salas and Brenda Karina Ayon Salas, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal, as untimely filed, of their motion to reopen the underlying de*544nial of their application for cancellation of removal.

In their opening brief, petitioners do not offer any explanation why their motion to reopen was filed more than eleven months past the filing deadline, but instead seek to challenge the underlying denial of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ranjit Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Maria Angelica Membreno v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API