Legal Opinion

Congdon v. Oneida County Grange Co-operative Fire Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingrose, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiff under rule 122 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order permitting the examination before trial of the defendant for the purpose of framing a complaint.

The action was commenced by the service of a summons. It is averred in the moving affidavits that the cause of action is based upon a fire insurance policy issued by the defendant to Alex Hannus, which contained a clause providing in substance that the policy insured the said Alex Hannus and any member, guest or servant of the Alex Hannus family, against all direct-loss by fire to an amount not exceeding…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Cromwell v. . the Brooklyn Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of Pa. v. National Ass'n of Flood InsurersDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Kennedy v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API