Congdon v. Oneida County Grange Co-operative Fire Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRingrose, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiff under rule 122 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order permitting the examination before trial of the defendant for the purpose of framing a complaint.
The action was commenced by the service of a summons. It is averred in the moving affidavits that the cause of action is based upon a fire insurance policy issued by the defendant to Alex Hannus, which contained a clause providing in substance that the policy insured the said Alex Hannus and any member, guest or servant of the Alex Hannus family, against all direct-loss by fire to an amount not exceeding…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Cromwell v. . the Brooklyn Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth of Pa. v. National Ass'n of Flood InsurersDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Kennedy v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960