James v. Cammack
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 24. — ACTION BY J. W. CAMMACK AGAINST FRANK P. JAMES, AUDITOR PUBLIC ACCOUNTS. Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court. • George C. Webb, Special Judge. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Chief Justice Barker
Affirming.
This action involves the constitutionality of an act of the General Assembly of the commonwealth of Kentucky, authorizing the regular circuit judges to act as special judges, and fixing their compensation for the additional duties discharged by them in so doing. The act in question is as follows:
“Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the commonwealth of Kentucky:
‘‘Section 1. That the regular circuit judges of the commonwealth of Kentucky, except those whose district embrace a city of either the first or second class, and wherein a court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Converse v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Flowers v. Logan CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Slayton v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Hughes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
- Mengel Jr. Brother Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
3Cited by22 opinions
- Coleman, Auditor v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Bond v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Cash's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Matthews v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
- Greene v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.