Legal Opinion

Zip Dee, Inc. v. Dometic Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 16, 1999No. 93 C 3200Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Anyone who has followed the extended succession of rulings and opinions in this patent infringement case 1 — either of necessity or, though this is hard to imagine, as a matter of choice — has had to be aware of this Court’s discomfort with some of the conclusions to which it has been driven. There is something intuitively troubling in the notion that a party such as asserted infringer Dometic Corporation (“Dometic”) can introduce into an awning — a product whose very purpose is to keep water from soaking the people whom it is designed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Zip Dee, Inc. v. Dometic Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API