Legal Opinion · Dissent

Keeton v. Hinkle, Unpublished Decision (3-10-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2000No. CA 871Unpublished

1Dissent

I agree with Judge Wise as to the analysis and disposition of the first assignment of error. I agree with Judges Wise and Hoffman as to the analysis and disposition of the second, fourth, fifth and sixth assignments of error. However, I respectfully dissent as to the analysis and disposition of the third assignment of error. Appellants, in their third assignment of error, challenge the trial court's calculation of compensatory damages. Appellants specifically argue that the trial court's calculation of appellants' damages for appellee's breach of its implied duty to perform work in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Akron v. CannDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
  2. Daniels v. Albert J. Corey Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API