Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Jones

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 12, 1977No. CM 433449Published

1DissentCook, Senior Judge

I do not concur.

I find that appellant’s guilty plea was predicated on a substantial misunderstanding as to the maximum punishment to which he was subjected and, therefore, would hold that his plea was improvident. United States v. Harden, 1 M.J. 258 (1976). While an inquiry posed to appellant by the judge at trial might have elicited a response clearly indicating that appellant was willing to plead guilty regardless of the ultimate decision as to the legal maximum sentence (see United States v. Frangoules, 1 M.J. 467 (1976); United States v. Harden, supra; United States v. Kleinhans, 14…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HardenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. KleinhansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. FrangoulesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. ShrumU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API