Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lane

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1979No. 2248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This appeal arises from an order entered in the court below denying appellant’s requested relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA).1 Appellant’s basic assertions are that a constitutionally infirm confession caused him to plead guilty; that counsel was ineffective for failing to pursue a suppression hearing; and that counsel was ineffective for advising him to plead under the circumstances. It is appellant’s position that he should be permitted then to withdraw the plea. For the reasons set forth herein, we .affirm the order of the court below.

On June 2, 1971, a First…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. MarshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. LoftonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. KittrelesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ArndtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Com. v. Estremera, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. MottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API