Legal Opinion

Hohertz v. Durham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 1920No. 6231PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant brought this suit for rescission of an executed contract for the exchange of lands; his original petition having been filed on the 12th day of June, 1919. Subsequently he filed an amendment, seeking rescission in one count, and in the alternative for damages on account of deficiency in acreage of the land conveyed to him. The date of the deed is August 24, 1912.

In the amended petition appellant alleged that he purchased from appellee 336 acres of land in Hamilton county, Tex., in a sale by the acre, at the agreed price of $35 per acre, and that the tract was represented by appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Smith v. FlyTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Bass v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Oldham v. MedearisTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Haney v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. North Austin State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Gillespie v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Ray v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Stuart v. DenmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Ali Mustafa and Ali Reza Lahijani v. Americo Energy Resources, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API