Legal Opinion

Hixson v. Slocum

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 16, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Owen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Nunn

Affirming.

Hixson sued to recover of Slocum damages for assault and battery, and upon the trial in tbe lower court tbe jury returned a verdict in favor of Slocum, tbe defendant.

Tbe parties are elderly men living in tbe town of Owenton, but on tbe day of tbe difficulty Slocum bad returned to town in a new automobile after a visit to tbe country. Tbe machine attracted quite a crowd, and Slocum insists tbat tbe presence of tbe machine and tbe crowd immediately in front of Hixson’s hotel was a mere co-incidence. Hixson maintains tbat it was premeditated on tbe part…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. May v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  2. Graves v. Dairyland Insurance GroupKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. RemleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API