Legal Opinion

The Ismert-Hincke Milling Company v. The Union Pacific Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1956No. 5327_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

This action was instituted in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas by the Ismert-Hincke Milling Company, herein called the Shipper, against the Union Pacific Railroad Company, herein called the Carrier, to collect $60,320.81, together with interest and attorney’s fees for loss suffered to shipments of goods by flood waters in Carrier’s Topeka, Kansas, Yards, during the 1951 flood. The ultimate issue was whether the loss was caused simply by an act of God or whether the negligence of the Carrier in failing to remove the shipments from the flood…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farr Co. v. Union Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Hunter Packing Co. v. Baltimore & O.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Naki v. Hawaiian Electric Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  2. George Mark, D/B/A Mark Grain Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  3. Naki v. Hawaiian Electric Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API