Legal Opinion
Ege v. Express Messenger Systems Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 9, 2019No. 2:16-cv-01167Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 ABDIRIZAQ EGE, ABDIRAHIM FARAH, Case No. 2:16-CV-1167-RSL 10 and ABDULKADIR HASSAN, and on behalf of other members of the general public ORDER DENYING 11 similarly situated, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 12 RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(b) Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS, INC., a 15 Delaware corporation doing business as 16 ONTRAC; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for relief under Federal Rule of 20 Civil Procedure (“Rule”)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- New Prime Inc. v. OliveiraSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Eduard Falk and Lettye M. Falk v. Sun Cha AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.