Legal Opinion

People v. Denton

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2005PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Abraham Gerges, J.

These cases present the issue of whether the ameliorative portions of the recently enacted changes to the Rockefeller drug laws (Drug Reform Act [DRA] are to be retroactively applied to the defendants who have not been sentenced prior to the effective date of the new statute. The People, in a memorandum of law, request that the court renege on the sentence promises made to the respective defendants. The prosecution alleges that the recent sentence reductions made by DRA to the so-called Rockefeller drug laws do not apply retroactively to these defendants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. People v. BehlogNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. United States v. DardenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. HammonsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  4. People v. StephenNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. DentonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API