Legal Opinion
Honolulu Rapid Transit Co. v. Wilder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 25, 1929No. 5763PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
Section 12 of the franchise of the Honolulu Rapid Transit Company, Limited, as originally enacted, provided as follows: “The company shall, during the month of January of eaeh year, pay to the City and County of Honolulu two and one-half per cent (2%%) of its gross income from its railway during the preceding calendar year.” Act 186, Session Laws of Hawaii 1921. In 1925 this section was amended by adding thereto the following proviso': “Provided, however, that no such payment shall be made, and said company shall be exempt therefrom, for eaeh and all *160of the calendar…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Michigan Central Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. EmmersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- New York Ex Rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. New York State Board of Tax CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Copper Queen Consolidated Mining Co. v. Territorial Board of Equalization of the Territory of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Territory of Hawaii v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Southern Boulevard R. Co. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Lord v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Monllor & Boscio v. SanchoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1943
- Spurway v. WeintraubCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933