Legal Opinion
In re Fab Universal Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 17, 2015No. 14 Civ 687(RWS)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge
Plaintiffs Kathi W. Thorbjornsen (“Thorbjornsen”) and Randolph J. Rowek-amp (“Rowenkamp”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1 for final approval of the proposed settlement resolving claims asserted in this shareholder derivative action against Christopher Spencer, Zhang Hongcheng, J. Gregory Smith, Douglas Polinsky, Denis Yevstifey-ev, Gu Jianfen, James Rogers Jr., John Busshaus, and FAB Universal Corporation (“FAB” or the “Company”), and for an award of attorney’s fees, reimbursement of expenses, and service…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allred v. WalkerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Erny v. MukundaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Erny v. MukundaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Fire and Police Retiree Health Care Fund, San Antonio v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Fulton County Employees' Retirement System v. BlankfeinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.