Cook v. Hale
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
At Law. Action by A. D. Cook against Hale & Ward. On motion by defendant for judgment non obstante veredicto and for new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, District Judge.
The court is entirely satisfied with the verdict of the jury, especially as the plaintiff at the hearing of the motion for a new trial agreed to, and no doubt will, execute and place in the hands of the clerk a reconveyance to the defendants of all the timber sold to him by the defendants under the terms of the contract described in the petition (none of which has been removed by the plaintiff), which reconveyance is to be delivered to the defendants upon the payment and satisfaction of the judgment herein. Undoubtedly there was either false misrepresentation or palpable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Cooper v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lehigh Zinc and Iron Company v. BamfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hill v. RaglandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Trimble v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Spence v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933