Legal Opinion

MacIvor v. Volvo Penta of America, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 18, 1985No. 84-1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The order under review quashing the process served in Sweden upon AB Volvo Penta, a Swedish corporation, on the ground that the appellants, by not timely filing an affidavit “by any officer authorized to serve process in the state where the person is served,” failed to comply with Section 48.194, Florida Statutes (1983), is reversed upon a holding that even assuming, arguendo, that such an affidavit must be filed when service is made in another state of the United States, see Nettles v. White, 439 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (service in Texas); Palmer Johnson Yachts v. Ray Richard, Inc.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nettles v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Yachts v. Ray Richard, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bevilacqua v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Koechli v. BIP International, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Puigbo v. Medex Trading, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. SEMET LICKSTEIN MORGENSTERN v. SawadaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Puigbo v. Medex Trading, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API