Legal Opinion

Pfeninghausen v. Shearer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Howell Circuit Court. — Hon. W. N. Evans, Judge..

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

The petition alleges that defendant on the twenty-seventh of September, 1892, executed a mortgage to plaintiff to secure ten promissory notes of *349said date, the first for $461, due on September 27,1893, the second for $500, due September 27, 1895, and the remainder for $500 each due at intervals of one year, the last one falling due September 27, 1904, and bearing interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from date. The mortgage embraced a fruit farm in Howell county, Missouri, and was conditioned, to wit: “That, if the said James W. Shearer shall pay said notes and reimburse said Richard…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hannah v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Fisher v. MilmineIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Burris v. Shrewsbury Park Land & Improvement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hotel Management Co. v. KricklSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Bordeaux v. Hartman Furniture & Carpet Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Dalton v. EavesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Rook v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API