Panico v. Young

In a proceeding, inter alia, to (1) declare that petitioner is entitled to the rights, benefits and protection of section 207-a of the General Municipal Law and (2) stay the respondents from holding a disciplinary hearing, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 21, *10521977, which denied the application. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision declaring that petitioner is not entitled to the rights, benefits and protection of section 207-a of the General Municipal Law. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and…