Legal Opinion
State v. Toale.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 26, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Before Purdy, J., Aiken, Fall Term, 1905. Indictment against R P. Tóale, Elijah Salley, Humphrey Chavous and Ben Chavous for obstructing neighborhood road. From' sentence on verdict, defendants appeal. cite: Adverse user for twenty years must be shown: 63 S>. C., 494; 54 S» C., 294. Deed improperly excluded: 63 S. C., 453.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
The defendants were indicted for obstructing a neighborhood road on the 12th of April, 1905, and were found guilty. At the trial they admitted placing the alleged obstruction in the road, but claimed that it was not a neighborhood road. They appealed upon exceptions, the first of which is as follows:
“The defendants except that his Honor, the presiding Judge, erred as. matter of law in overruling the motion for the new trial, which was made upon the following grounds, to wit: ‘That it is an admitted fact, or at least one proven beyond a…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- State v. RodmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908