Legal Opinion

Hibschman v. Board of Tax Appeals

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1943No. 29497PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The Board of Tax Appeals is not required to adopt the valuation fixed by any expert or witness. Citizens Building Co. of Cleveland v. Board of Revision of Cuyahoga County, 141 Ohio St., 47, 51, 46 N. E. (2d), 413; American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey v. Board of Revision of Cuyahoga County, 139 Ohio St., 388, 393, 40 N. E. (2d), 426.

“The burden is upon a taxpayer to prove his right to a deduction and he is not entitled to the full amount of deduction claimed merely because no evidence is adduced contra his claim.” Higbee Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 140 Ohio St., 325, 332, 43 N.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Citizens Building Co. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Mahoning County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Worthington City Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API