Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the circuit court of Hinds county. Hon. W, A. Henry, Judge. Jim Dixon was convicted of manslaughter and appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

Jim Dixon, defendant below, and his father, were drunk. Jim had a pistol concealed upon his person, and fired this pistol into the ground. The bullet struck a tin can, glanced, and struck and killed a young woman standing upon the porch or gallery of a storehouse near by. The pistol was fired by defendant while he was in or near the public highway, and the scene of the tragedy was near a crossroads country store in Yazoo county. Thus it will be observed that Jim was then and there violating three of the statutes of the state, viz., carrying a concealed weapon, drunk in a public place, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Horton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Potter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. McCarty v. State ex rel. BooneIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. O'BRYANT v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. BudgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Holder v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API