Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Davis v. Thiede

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1964No. 30,092Published

1Concurrence

Opinion Concurring in Result

Landis, C. J.

— I concur in the result of Judge Jackson’s opinion for the reason that no constitutional question- is presented in this Court in view-of the failure of appellant to show he previously pointed out to the trial court the particular constitutional provision allegedly violated. See: Prunk v. Indpls. Redevelopment Comm. (1950), 228 Ind. 579, 586, 93 N. E. 2d 171, 173, 340 U. S. 950, 95 L. Ed. 685, 71 S. Ct. 575; Scott v. Scott, Admrx. et al. (1958), 238 Ind. 474, 481, 486, 150 N. E. 2d 740, 743, 746.

Appellees’ petition to transfer this caúse to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prunk v. Indianapolis Redevelopment CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Scott v. SCOTT, ADMRX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Davis v. ThiedeIndiana Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API