Legal Opinion
Singer Company v. Tappan Company
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 20, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 75-757PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
403 F.Supp. 322 (1975)
In the Matter of the Arbitration between the SINGER COMPANY, Petitioner,
and
The TAPPAN COMPANY, Respondent.
Civ. A. No. 75-757.
United States District Court, D. New Jersey.
October 20, 1975.
Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Debovoise, Newark, N. J., Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, New York City, of counsel, for petitioner.
Clapp & Eisenberg, Newark, N. J., for respondent.
OPINION
LACEY, District Judge:
PRELIMINARY
Presented is the issue of arbitrability of a certain dispute between the parties. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, I find in favor of the petitioner and grant its…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Mercury Construction Corporation, Mercury Construction Corporation v. The Moses H. Cone Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Mahony-Troast Constr. v. Supermarkets Gen'lNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- In Re Mercury Construction Corporation, Mercury Construction Corporation v. The Moses H. Cone Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981