Legal Opinion

Warner v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1909No. Appeal, No. 59Published

Appeal, No. 59, April T., 1905, by-defendant, from judgment on verdict for plaintiff in case of Catherine F. Warner v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. Motion to quash appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The only matters assigned for error are the refusal of the defendant's point for binding instruction, and the refusal of its motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. It was absolutely essential to the determination of the questions sought to be raised by these assignments that the evidence be brought upon the record. While the stenographer transcribed both the charge and the notes of testimony, and certified to them, and the learned trial judge approved the transcript of the charge and ordered it to be filed, he did not sign and attach to the transcript of the evidence a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yoast v. BeattySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. McCandless v. McWhaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API