Legal Opinion

Brodsky v. Zagata

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 16, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtYesawich Jr., J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Keegan, J.), entered February 16,1996 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted petitioners’ motion pursuant to CPLR 2308 to compel respondent to comply with a subpoena duces tecum.

Concerned that consent orders entered into by the Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter DEC) were negotiated with little or no public participation, petitioner Richard Brodsky (hereinafter petitioner) initiated a legislative inquiry to ascertain whether legislation restricting such consent orders should be enacted. As part of the investigation, *765petitioner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. McMahon v. LandonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Temporary State Commission on Lobbying v. CraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API