Legal Opinion

Richardson v. City of Suffolk

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 1, 1996No. Record 960372PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy

This appeal involves a challenge to a zoning ordinance granting a conditional use permit for the operation of an automobile racetrack in the City of Suffolk.

Following a public hearing, the City of Suffolk enacted two zoning ordinances. The first ordinance, No. 1-95, rezoned 65 acres of land owned by UA Associates from an agricultural use classification to B-2, General Business. The second ordinance, No. 2-95, granted UA Associates a conditional use permit allowing the 65 acres of land to be used for an automobile racetrack subject to a number of conditions.

Mary Richardson and other citizens…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. BOARD OF SUP'RS, ETC. v. Southland Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  2. Byrum v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  3. CITY COUN. OF VIRGINIA BEACH v. HarrellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  4. Bollinger v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Roanoke CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  5. Wiley v. County of HanoverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Nelson County Board of SupervisorsNelson County Circuit Court · 2007
  2. Bennett v. Nelson County Board of SupervisorsNelson County Circuit Court · 2006
  3. Guest v. King George County Board of SupervisorsKing George County Circuit Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API