Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Binns

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1929No. Appeal, 77PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

Plaintiff sued in trespass for, fraud and deceit in connection with the execution and delivery by plaintiff of a note for $15,000 to the First National Bank of Donora, of which defendant was vice-president, the action being based on an alleged misrepresentation by defendant as to the ownership of a Dodge automobile agency by the Ridgely Motor Co. of which defendant was president and also on a promise by defendant, made when the note was given to the bank by plaintiff, that, upon the incorporation of the Woodward Motor Co., which was being organized by plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. LawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Humphrey Et Ux. v. Brown Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Standard Interlock Elevator Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Clapp v. HuntSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. First Nat. Bank of Donora v. PurcellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klerlein v. WernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. A. P. Landis, Inc. v. MellingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Costley v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API