Wilkin v. . Raplee
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal cannot be sustained. Although a judgment was entered for costs against the plaintiffs, it was unauthorized and irregular, and the court below would have vacated it on motion. The judgment of the Special Term was reversed at General Term, and the motion for judgment denied. That was the effect of the order and decision, but no judgment was given against the plaintiffs. The reversal was with costs, but leave was given to the plaintiffs to demur, to answer (that is, to reply), or go to trial, as they might elect. The proceeding was interlocutory, the litigation was not terminated, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Van Alstyne v. . FredayNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re BrasierNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
- Riverside Chemical Co. v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- People Ex Rel. Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Prentiss v. BowdenThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
- Prentiss v. BowdenThe Superior Court of New York City · 1895