Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pearce v. Dunn

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 25, 1923No. 11115Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : Proceedings for ejectment instituted in Magistrate Court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appealed to Circuit Court. Judgment of Magistrate affirmed. Defendant appeals to this Court.

The facts appear to be as follows: On December 23, 1919, the defendant, Dunn, owner of the tract of land in question, sold and conveyed it to the plaintiff, Pearce, receiving a bond and mortgage covering the property as security for the purchase price. After the conveyance the defendant, Dunn, remained in possession as tenant of the plaintiff, Pearce, and for the year 1921 there was a written…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hardin v. HardinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API