Longacre v. Longacre
Missouri Court of Appeals
-Appeal from Johnson Circuit Court. — Hon. Nick M. Bradley, Judge. (1) The facts create a tenancy from November 24, 1906, to January 1, 1907, a time certain, fixed and. agreed upon. (2) In this case no notice to quit was necessary, the time for the termination being definite, certain and understood. Young v. Smith, 28 Mo. 65; Butts v. Fox, 96 Mo. App. 437; Mostin v. Wetsinger, 99 Mo. App. 613; Ray v. Blackman, 120 Mo.
Read the full summary
-Appeal from Johnson Circuit Court. — Hon. Nick M. Bradley, Judge. (1) The facts create a tenancy from November 24, 1906, to January 1, 1907, a time certain, fixed and. agreed upon. (2) In this case no notice to quit was necessary, the time for the termination being definite, certain and understood. Young v. Smith, 28 Mo. 65; Butts v. Fox, 96 Mo. App. 437; Mostin v. Wetsinger, 99 Mo. App. 613; Ray v. Blackman, 120 Mo. App. 497. (3) The last contract was a legal and valid one, being for less than a year, and was a different contract from the one under which defendant originally held…
1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, P. J.
This action is for unlawful detainer. The facts of the case as found by the court were as MIoavs:
“In this case, the court finds the facts to be that, on or about June 15, 1905, plaintiff Avas the owner of the lands described in his complaint; that he was a widoAver; that defendant, his grandson, was living at Chapel Hill, in Lafayette county, with his wife and children; that on .or about said time said plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement Avhereby defendant Avas to move onto plaintiff’s farm, with his family, and to occupy said farm thereafter as the tenant of plaintiff; that he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyd v. PaulSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Galway v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- McDonald v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Gwin v. SmurrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Smith v. Smith Bros.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rauth v. DennisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962