Legal Opinion

Mathison v. Newton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is a personal injury action in which the plain*364tiff appeals from a judgment for the defendants pursuant to a directed verdict.

Plaintiff was injured as the result of a fall into a sidewalk elevator shaft in the City of Portland. The defendants are W. D. Newton, doing business as Business Equipment Bureau, tenant of a building on abutting property for whose use in receiving and shipping merchandise the elevator was maintained, and Newton’s landlord, Morrison Twelveth, Inc., a corporation. On this appeal the ruling as to Morrison Twelveth, Inc., is not challenged and our only question is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Bosler Hotel Co. v. SpeedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Wriglesworth v. DoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Umphlette v. City of SilvertonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Mitchell v. AusplundOregon Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitlow v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Helsel v. Western Elevator Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API